inductive proof造句
例句與造句
- This can be shown by inductive proof.
- The same technique can be used to give an inductive proof of the volume formula.
- He gives the first non-inductive proof of the binomial expansion for integer exponent using combinatorial arguments.
- This is a great help, as the system has an unproductive tendency to wander down infinite chains of inductive proofs.
- This is especially true in inductive proofs, where the given expression is taken to be the inductive hypothesis, and the target expression the inductive conclusion.
- It's difficult to find inductive proof in a sentence. 用inductive proof造句挺難的
- A proof such as a deductive proof, an inductive proof, a proof by contradiction, and a proof by construction are the usual stuff that a mathematician follows and accepts readily.
- This proof tree can be shown to contain at most 4 \ log _ 2 n-4 values other than 2 by a simple inductive proof ( based on Theorem 2 of Pratt ).
- Of course in practice many inductive proofs / recursive constructions are trivial at the limit step, and start with a well-understood object at the base, so you write down only the successor step.
- An inductive proof generally shows that some property is true for any " finite " integer " n "; such a proof can't show that it's true if " n " is infinite.
- The all-at-once proof " does " have the merit of characterizing the points that are kept, but the inductive proof shows the structure of what has to be removed ( and in particular the structure of countable closed sets in general ).
- I've looked at inductive proof but it seems a bit messy and I'm hoping there's a nice clean / concise solution-I have no doubt the reference desk brains are far more capable of coming up with an elegant proof than I am; ) ( or if there is a particularly concise inductive proof, I have nothing against induction ! ) Could anyone suggest anything, please?
- I've looked at inductive proof but it seems a bit messy and I'm hoping there's a nice clean / concise solution-I have no doubt the reference desk brains are far more capable of coming up with an elegant proof than I am; ) ( or if there is a particularly concise inductive proof, I have nothing against induction ! ) Could anyone suggest anything, please?